‘Pulse of Work 2025’ Report Reveals Most Employees Say Gener
July 1, 2025 | by Ethan Rhodes

Generative AI: From Hype to Helpful
Insights & next-step tactics inspired by the new “Pulse of Work 2025” report
The Pulse of Work 2025 study from GoTo and Workplace Intelligence just landed, and—no surprise—it’s stirring up debate. After surveying 2,500 employees worldwide, the researchers found that 62 percent say generative AI is overhyped and is actually dragging down, not lifting up, their productivity (GoTo).
As someone who coaches teams on squeezing the most juice out of every workday, I’m not shocked. We’ve been promised “robot butlers for knowledge work,” yet many of us are still drowning in email threads, status pings, and half-baked AI drafts that need more polishing than if we’d written them ourselves.
Why the Hype Hangover?
Digging into the report, three friction points jump out:
- Under-skilled users. A hefty 86 percent admit they aren’t tapping AI’s full potential, and 82 percent don’t feel comfortable applying it to everyday tasks (GoTo).
- Low trust in the outputs. Another 86 percent say the tools regularly spit out work that needs fixing or fact-checking (GoTo).
- Misdirected usage. Over half (54 percent) confess they’ve used AI for delicate, “please don’t mess this up” decisions—like performance reviews or safety-critical calls—despite company policy (GoTo).
Add it up and you have a classic tech-adoption gap: big expectations, minimal enablement, and zero guardrails.
The Productivity Paradox
Zoom out and the pattern repeats. Even as AI tools multiply, overall labor-productivity growth in advanced economies has sagged to around 0.8 percent—less than half the 1990s pace (Financial Times).
The culprit? Better software doesn’t automatically produce better workflows. Unless we re-engineer how work travels through an organization, we’re just bolting a faster engine onto a wagon wheel.
Five Moves to Flip the Script
If you want the upside of generative AI without the hype hangover, bake these moves into your next 90-day plan. They cost little more than intent and iteration.
- Pick one “10× task” per team. Instead of sprinkling ChatGPT on everything, nominate a single repetitive duty—weekly reports, ad-hoc research, data cleansing—and redesign it around AI. Success breeds appetite.
- Create a five-minute safeguard rule. If the AI’s answer can’t be validated inside five minutes (sales quotes, legal copy, medical facts), it’s not the right task yet. This dials down trust anxiety and keeps errors inexpensive.
- Coach prompt archetypes, not prompt scripts. Teams shouldn’t memorize exact text but understand archetypes—summaries, expansions, comparisons. That mental model transfers tool-to-tool and future-proofs their skill set.
- Establish “yellow-flag” checkpoints. Borrow from aviation: any AI-assisted asset touching regulation, ethics, or safety requires a human-in-the-loop sign-off. It turns covert misuse into overt collaboration and protects brand risk.
- Measure reclaimable hours, not raw usage. Leaders fixate on “percentage of employees using AI,” but the metric that matters is hours returned to high-value work. Survey the team monthly—people can feel 90 minutes back in their day; they can’t feel a 14-percent usage stat.
Personal Playbook: Making AI Your New Intern
Outside the org-wide reforms, here’s how you—yes, you, the calendar warrior reading this—can turn generative AI into your personal intern:
- Morning triage. Feed yesterday’s meeting notes (or audio transcripts) to your tool of choice and ask for three action items plus blockers. You start the day with a prioritized to-do list instead of a fuzzy memory.
- Template, then tailor. Let AI draft the skeleton—slides, outreach emails, job descriptions—and spend your energy on nuance, voice, and relationship context. Think 70 percent auto-generated, 30 percent human finesse.
- Build a “failure scrapbook.” Every time the model fails spectacularly, screenshot it into a shared folder with a note on why. This living scrapbook trains teammates faster than any polished best-practice doc.
Outlook: Less Magic, More Mechanics
The Pulse of Work 2025 report is a needed gut-check. Generative AI won’t rescue us from productivity doldrums until we treat it less like magic and more like plumbing: invisible, reliable, and built into every process.
The bright side? Once employees get even basic training plus clear do/don’t lanes, most report tangible gains. Accenture, the Federal Reserve, and others are already clocking 30-plus percent output bumps in hour-by-hour studies (HR Dive).
Bottom line: the tools are here. The time savings are provable. The next move is ours—choose a workflow, set guardrails, and turn the hype into habits. See you on the other side of that extra 2.6-hour window.

RELATED POSTS
View all