When AI Automates Your Tasks, Employers Just Add More: The P
July 11, 2025 | by Ethan Rhodes

When AI Automates Your Tasks, Employers Just Add More: The Productivity Paradox
Hey there—I’m Ethan Rhodes, workplace strategist and productivity coach. Over the past decade I’ve witnessed automation move from futuristic promise to everyday reality. Calendar assistants book meetings while we sleep, GPT-style tools draft reports in minutes, and CRMs now log calls without human keystrokes. On paper, all this horsepower should mean shorter workweeks and lighter mental loads. Yet most of the professionals I coach feel more pressed than ever. What gives?
Here’s the paradox: each time technology unlocks capacity, organizations rush to fill the vacuum with fresh work rather than returning the dividend to you.
How We Got Stuck on the Hamster Wheel
In classic economics, increasing output per worker should eventually lead to fewer hours or at least saner schedules. But knowledge work operates on softer rules:
- Outputs are elastic. Unlike factory widgets, “better marketing,” “more engagement,” or “deeper insights” have no natural ceiling. More time or more AI just means more versions, more experiments, more slide decks.
- Visibility trumps value. Leaders still judge contribution by activity they can see—emails sent, tickets closed, dashboards updated—so every new AI timesaver often spawns another visible deliverable.
- Cultural inertia. The 40-hour (or 50-hour) norm is stubborn. If you blow through a Tuesday because the bot finished half your work, Wednesday simply gains a brand-new backlog.
The Hidden Cost of “More”
Extra tasks aren’t just annoying; they erode the very gains automation promised:
1. Cognitive Switching Taxes
Tacking on four tiny tasks can slash focus more than one large task ever would. Each switch reboots context, stealing minutes and mental energy.
2. Decision Fatigue
With AI generating a buffet of options—five campaign headlines, ten slide templates—you shoulder the burden of picking the best. Choice requires willpower, and willpower is finite.
3. Diminished Creativity
When your day is choked with low-impact reviews and approvals, you have no runway left for original thinking—the stuff that actually moves the needle (and sparks joy).
Flip the Script: Reclaiming the Dividend
Let’s talk action. Below are field-tested tactics I use with clients to make sure automation works for them, not the other way around.
1. Set a Fixed “Gain Share” Rule
Anytime a tool saves you an hour, commit half that hour to deep work or rest before accepting new tasks. Put it on the calendar immediately—no white space for others to invade.
2. Create a “Stop-Doing” List
- List every task the AI now covers.
- Slash associated busywork: status pings, double-checks, redundant documentation.
- Share the list with your manager so it’s official. Visibility kills scope creep.
3. Quantify, Then Negotiate
Track hours won through automation for a full month. Present the data in your next one-on-one: “AI took 18 hours off my plate. I propose we redirect 8 of them to the new project and 10 to strategic research.” Managers respect numbers.
4. Guard Decision Bandwidth
Configure your tools to return recommended actions—not sprawling creativity farms—whenever possible. Fewer branches, faster moves.
5. Adopt “Thematic” Work Blocks
Use your liberated capacity to batch similar tasks. AI can crank out three proposals, but reviewing them back-to-back beats sprinkling reviews across the week.
Leading Teams? Bake in the Dividend
If you manage others, you hold the lever that solves the paradox. Two leadership habits make the difference:
- Institutionalize caps. Agree on maximum weekly outputs (e.g., one major deck, two minor analyses). New automation doesn’t lift the cap—it improves quality.
- Reward reduction. Celebrate teams that delete outdated processes or reports instead of piling on new ones. Fewer moving parts, happier humans.
The Bigger Picture
AI is not a genie that grants free time by default. It’s a power tool, and like any tool it can either serve the craftsperson or send them home exhausted. The line between the two isn’t coded in silicon; it’s drawn by intentional boundaries.
I’ve seen marketers reclaim Friday afternoons for big-picture thinking, engineers cut release stress in half, and customer-success reps spend real time building relationships—all because they insisted on capturing their automation dividend instead of surrendering it.
You deserve the same win. Guard your gains, invest them wisely, and watch the paradox dissolve.

RELATED POSTS
View all